<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Prompt-Caching on Sebastian Spicker</title>
    <link>https://sebastianspicker.github.io/tags/prompt-caching/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Prompt-Caching on Sebastian Spicker</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.160.0</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://sebastianspicker.github.io/tags/prompt-caching/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Token Saving, Revisited: Right About the Noise, Wrong About the Bill</title>
      <link>https://sebastianspicker.github.io/posts/token-saving-revisited/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://sebastianspicker.github.io/posts/token-saving-revisited/</guid>
      <description>In June I argued that token saving in agent systems is noise reduction. The quality half of that argument holds, and the evidence for it is stronger than the June post showed. The cost half rested on an assumption I never wrote down: that fewer tokens always means a smaller bill. With prompt caching, a token you keep is far cheaper than a token you change, so some compression costs more than it saves. And the filters I recommended put their own tool definitions into every request. This post does the arithmetic.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
