<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Malware on Sebastian Spicker</title>
    <link>https://sebastianspicker.github.io/tags/malware/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Malware on Sebastian Spicker</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.160.0</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://sebastianspicker.github.io/tags/malware/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>GitHub Stars Are for Sale, and the Real Problem Is Not Vanity</title>
      <link>https://sebastianspicker.github.io/posts/github-stars-reputation-laundering/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://sebastianspicker.github.io/posts/github-stars-reputation-laundering/</guid>
      <description>Buying GitHub stars sounds pathetic enough to be a joke. The joke misses the interesting part. Stars are a public trust signal on a code-hosting platform, and there is an ordinary, low-friction market for faking them. The important question is not whether inflated stars reliably produce downloads. It is why counterfeit popularity is so cheap to buy, and why that becomes a security problem once fake credibility attaches to malicious repositories.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
